Site icon Harmony Thrive

A machine learning tool for predicting newly diagnosed osteoporosis in primary healthcare in the Stockholm Region

A machine learning tool for predicting newly diagnosed osteoporosis in primary healthcare in the Stockholm Region
  • Singer, A. J., Sharma, A., Deignan, C. & Borgermans, L. Closing the gap in osteoporosis management: the critical role of primary care in bone health. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 39, 387–398 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, R. R. & Deng, H. W. Role of genetics in osteoporosis. Endocrine 17, 55–66 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. A. et al. An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice. Nat. Genet. 51, 258–266 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraki, S. et al. Diet and lifestyle associated with increased bone mineral density: Cross-sectional study of Japanese elderly women at an osteoporosis outpatient clinic. J. Orthop. Sci. 12, 317–320 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanis, J,A., Cooper, C., Rizzoli, R., Reginster, J.Y., Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for C, Economic Aspects of O, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos. Int. 30, 3–44 (2019).

  • Abtahi, S. et al. Secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures among 50+ adults in Denmark between 1995 and 2010. Osteoporos. Int. 30, 2217–2223 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, A. H. et al. Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis?. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64, 46–53 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. J., Chan, D. D., Lee, J. K., Tabu, I. & Alpuerto, B. B. The global burden of fragility fractures – what are the differences, and where are the gaps. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 36, 101777 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnell, O. & Kanis, J. A. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 17, 1726–1733 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernlund, E. et al. Osteoporosis in the European union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: A report prepared in collaboration with the international osteoporosis foundation (IOF) and the European federation of pharmaceutical industry associations (EFPIA). Arch. Osteoporos. 8, 136 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauley, J. A., Chalhoub, D., Kassem, A. M. & Fuleihan, G. H. Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 10, 338–351 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. F. & Seeman, E. Epidemiology and structural basis of racial differences in fragility fractures in Chinese and Caucasians. Osteoporos. Int. 23, 411–422 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofthus, C. M. et al. Epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in Oslo, Norway. Osteoporos. Int. 19, 781–786 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J. G. et al. Application of machine learning approaches for osteoporosis risk prediction in postmenopausal women. Arch. Osteoporos. 15, 169 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakab, M., Farrington, J., Borgermans, L. & Mantingh, F. Health systems respond to noncommunicable diseases: time for ambition. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO regional office for Europe. Public Health Panor. 4, 507–514 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuggle, N. R. et al. The treatment gap: The missed opportunities for osteoporosis therapy. Bone 144, 115833 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaise, O. et al. High detection rate of osteoporosis with screening of a general hospitalized population: A 6-year study in 6406 patients in a university hospital setting. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 21, 90 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. J., Chih-Hsing, Wu. P. & Bergin, D. Risk assessment tools for osteoporosis and fractures in 2022. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 36, 101775 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballane, G., Cauley, J. A., Luckey, M. M. & El-Hajj, F. G. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 28, 1531–1542 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bow, C. H. et al. Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk. Osteoporos. Int. 23, 879–885 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnell, O. & Kanis, J. A. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos. Int. 15, 897–902 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghannam, S., Blaney, H., Gelfond, J. & Bruder, J. M. The use of FRAX in identifying women less than 65 years needing bone mineral density testing. J. Clin. Densitom. 24, 36–43 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasiuk, J. M., Nowakowska-Plaza, A., Wislowska, M. & Gluszko, P. Osteoporosis and diabetes—Possible links and diagnostic difficulties. Reumatologia 61, 294–304 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, T. G. et al. Ten-year follow-up of fracture risk in a systematic population-based screening program: The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation (ROSE) randomised trial. EClinicalMedicine 71, 102584 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevroja, E. et al. Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: Results of an expert group meeting organized by the European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO), and the international osteoporosis foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO collaborating center for epidemiology of musculoskeletal health and aging. Osteoporos. Int. 34, 1501–1529 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H. Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 30, 1–16 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M. et al. Fall risk assessment predicts fall-related injury, hip fracture, and head injury in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 64, 2242–2250 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulbay, A., Vest, D., Thorngren, K.G., Hommel, A. & Hedstrom, M. Osteoporotic fractures—Still a challenge, the Swedish National Hip Fracture Registry shows undertreatment of osteoporosis after hip fractures. Lakartidningen.118 (2021).

  • Smets, J., Shevroja, E., Hugle, T., Leslie, W. D. & Hans, D. Machine learning solutions for osteoporosis—A Review. J. Bone Miner. Res. 36, 833–851 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, T. K. et al. Osteoporosis risk prediction for bone mineral density assessment of postmenopausal women using machine learning. Yonsei Med. J. 54, 1321–1330 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, B. et al. Interpretable deep-learning approaches for osteoporosis risk screening and individualized feature analysis using large population-based data: Model development and performance evaluation. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e40179 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Joo, G., Shin, S., Im, H. & Moon, K. W. Prediction of osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 13, 21800 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. et al. Development of machine learning models for predicting osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—A preliminary study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 16, 1987–2003 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. et al. Application of machine learning algorithms to predict osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 46, 2535–2546 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38, 367–378 (2002).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, A. C. et al. High prevalence of diagnosis of diabetes, depression, anxiety, hypertension, asthma and COPD in the total population of Stockholm, Sweden—A challenge for public health. BMC Public Health 13, 670 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29(5), 1189–1232 (2001).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fregoso-Aparicio, L., Noguez, J., Montesinos, L. & Garcia-Garcia, J. A. Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 13, 148 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandell, P. et al. A machine learning tool for identifying patients with newly diagnosed diabetes in primary care. Prim. Care Diabetes 18 (5), 501–505 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandell, P. et al. Most common diseases diagnosed in primary care in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011. Fam. Pract. 30, 506–513 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2016).

  • Gupta, A. et al. Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 14, 1759720X221083523 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, A. S., Lins, H. C., Medeiros, R. V. A., Filho, J. M. F. & da Silva, S. G. Artificial intelligence on the identification of risk groups for osteoporosis, a general review. Biomed. Eng. Online 17, 12 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferizi, U., Honig, S. & Chang, G. Artificial intelligence, osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 31, 368–375 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, F. et al. Machine learning algorithms for diagnosis of hip bone osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. Biomed. Eng. Online. 22, 68 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. & Davis, A. Diagnosis and management of vertebral compression fractures. Am. Fam. Physician 94, 44–50 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanis, J. A. et al. Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos. Int. 11, 669–674 (2000).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L. et al. The prevalence of vertebral fractures is associated with reduced hip bone density and inferior peripheral appendicular volumetric bone density and structure in older women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 33, 250–260 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubino, F. J. et al. Active identification of vertebral fracture in the FLS model of care. Arch. Osteoporos. 18, 89 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeytinoglu, M., Jain, R. K. & Vokes, T. J. Vertebral fracture assessment: Enhancing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. Bone 104, 54–65 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. L. & Kaplan, F. S. Osteoporosis. Definition and clinical presentation. Spine Phila Pa 1976 22, 12S-S16 (1997).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alswat, K. A. Gender disparities in osteoporosis. J. Clin. Med. Res. 9, 382–387 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Terakado, A. et al. A clinical prospective observational cohort study on the prevalence and primary diagnostic accuracy of occult vertebral fractures in aged women with acute lower back pain using magnetic resonance imaging. Pain Res. Manag. 2017, 9265259 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L., Sundh, D., Nilsson, M., Mellstrom, D. & Lorentzon, M. Vertebral fractures and their association with health-related quality of life, back pain and physical function in older women. Osteoporos. Int. 29, 89–99 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L. et al. Improved fracture risk prediction by adding VFA-identified vertebral fracture data to BMD by DXA and clinical risk factors used in FRAX. Osteoporos. Int. 33, 1725–1738 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Salari, N. et al. The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 16, 609 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, P. D. et al. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: The IMPACT study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 20, 557–563 (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Exit mobile version